ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Bladder Instillation Comparison Study
To compare the efficacy of Mitomycin C vs. Gemcitabine vs. no adjuvant treatment as a single intraoperative instillation in preventing recurrence of bladder cancer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Without Cystectomy for Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Cancer and Select Genetic Alterations#871859
- Avelumab in Combination With Fluorouracil and Mitomycin or Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy in Treating Participants With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer#181751
- Neoadjuvent Dose-dense Gemcitabine and Cisplatin In Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer#1073297
- A Randomized Study Comparing Single Agent Gemcitabine Intravesical Therapy Versus Mitomycin C in Patients With Intermediate Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer#807047
- A Prospective Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine/Platinum in Muscle-Invasive or Locally-Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder#1059706
Record · ID 1095544
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive