ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Conventional Versus Modified Pre-surgical Naso-Alveolar Molding Treatment in Cleft Lip and Palate Infants
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinically conventional Pre-surgical Naso-Alveolar Molding (PNAM) treatment versus Modified Naso-Alveolar Molding protocol (MPNAM) in cleft lip and palate patients in terms of: 1. Decreasing cleft gap. 2. Attaining columellar length. 3. Effect on maxillary growth. 4. Treatment Duration. 5. Parents acceptance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in New Borns With Cleft Lip and Palate#917345
- Evaluating the Impact of Prefabricated Acrylic Splints on Premaxillary Stability in Alveolar Cleft Bone Graft Repairs: a Randomized Controlled Trial#1095140
- Alveolar Cleft Hard- and Soft Tissue Reconstruction With an Autogenous Tooth Derived Particulate Graft#806852
- Postoperative Complications After Cleft Palate Closure in Patients With Pierre Robin Sequence: Operative Considerations#908772
- Facial Artery Musculomucosal Flap and Bone Volume Gain in Alveolar Cleft Repair"#1046739
Record · ID 1095668
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive