ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing Two Shoulder Treatments for Athletes
Many athletes who play overhead sports like cricket develop tightness in the back of the shoulder. This causes pain and makes it hard to lift the arm. This study will compare two common physical therapy treatments: Kaltenborn joint mobilization (a specific manual therapy glide) versus a Pragmatic Posterior Capsular Stretch (a specific stretching technique). We want to see which one works better for pain, range of motion, and daily function. 28 athletes will be treated for 4 weeks, and we will measure their progress using a goniometer and the SPADI questionnaire.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Ballistic Exercises on Pain, Disability, and Explosive Strength in Tennis Players With Shoulder Pain.#888869
- Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Technique VS Traditional Physical Therapy#835552
- Effectiveness of a Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation#898319
- Sleeper's and Adduction Stretch to Increase Shoulder ROM#871222
- The Effect Of Stretching Exercise on Pectoralis Minor Myofascial Latent Trigger Points#873048
Record · ID 1095796
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive