ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single-centre Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly performed. However, technical challenges and a perceived higher risk of complications has hindered wide adoption of a minimally invasive approach. This is a retrospective comparison of a prospectively kept database. The investigators compared surgical outcomes and survival after laparoscopic (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). In order to reduce the effect of bias and confounding, baseline characteristics of both groups were matched using propensity score matching.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of Preoperative Hemotologic Markers on Postoperative Long-term and Short-term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Gastrectomy#894740
- Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer Duodenal Fluid-Based Biomarker Exploratory Study#1170976
- Prognostic Factors and Oncological Outcomes in Laparoscopic Liver Resection for CRLM#828386
- Early POstoperative BIomarkers in PancreatoDuodenectomy: a Spanish Nationwide Study#888481
- A Clinical Risk Score to Stratify High-risk PanNETs#1047266
Record · ID 1096627
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive