ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Periodontal Status and Failure Rates With Different Retainer Bonding Techniques Using One-step Adhesive
The aim of this study was to evaluate fixed retainers, bonded with either direct or indirect techniques using one- or two-step adhesives, in terms of periodontal status and failure rates.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Two Types of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers: an RCT.#1126980
- 3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL#901736
- Operator Experience Does Not Affect the Reliability of Universal Adhesives' Bond Strength; Adhesive Type Does.#312473
- Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of Different Toothbrushes in Clear Aligner Patients#801757
- Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers#1031835
Record · ID 1096669
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive