PsyArXiv
metadata only
No evidence that positive outcomes elicit a stronger sense of agency once correcting for publication bias: a commentary on, and re-analysis of, Mariano et al. (2025)
In a recent meta-analysis, Mariano et al. (2025) conclude that people experience a stronger sense of agency over positive than negative outcomes, indexed by temporal compression. In this commentary, we evaluate that claim and identify several concerns about its validity. First, we argue that tempora
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- No evidence that positive outcomes elicit a stronger sense of agency once correcting for publication bias: a commentary on, and re-analysis of, Mariano et al. (2025)#1098601
- No evidence that positive outcomes elicit a stronger sense of agency once correcting for publication bias: a commentary on, and re-analysis of, Mariano et al. (2025)#1098531
- Review of Jonathan Payton's '_Negative Actions: Events, Absences, and the Metaphysics of Agency_'#75165
- Review: Implicit Bias and Philosophy (vol. 1 & 2)#116175
- Institutions of Epistemic Vigilance: The Case of the Newspaper Press#771968
Record · ID 1098529
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive