SocArXiv
metadata only
Systematic Evaluation of Nation-State Propaganda in LLM Outputs
The rapid growth and usability of AI is creating new risks to information quality, including the possibility that chatbot responses spread propaganda from state-backed influence campaigns. There is little systematic evidence regarding how frequently LLMs spread such narratives when responding to use
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences#1156216
- A light-touch AI literacy intervention helps protect against AI political persuasion#1014850
- What Is The Political Content in LLMs' Pre- and Post-Training Data?#1050768
- Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structure#1117767
- "AI Psychosis" in Context: How Conversation History Shapes LLM Responses to Delusional Beliefs#1142658
Record · ID 1098728
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive