SocArXiv
metadata only
Does Carbon Pricing Outperform Command-and-Control Regulation? Firm-Level Evidence from Korea’s Dual Regulatory Framework
This study exploits South Korea’s unique dual-policy, in which an emissions trading scheme (ETS) and a command-and-control program (Target Management System, TMS) operate in parallel, to compare carbon pricing with prescriptive regulation at the firm level. Using a difference-in-differences design o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Carbon Pricing Outperform Command-and-Control Regulation? Firm-Level Evidence from Korea’s Dual Regulatory Framework#146649
- On Sustainability and Consumer Behaviour#88702
- The Social Cost of Carbon, Greenhouse Gas Policies, and Politicized Benefit/Cost Analysis#1021863
- Carbon offset market and cap-and-trade: Firm behavior, market dynamics, and policy design#308392
- International Experience on ESG in Promoting the Development of Carbon Markets and Lessons for Vietnam#174158
Record · ID 1098733
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive