ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Exair® Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
The purpose of this study is to compare safety and effectiveness of the Exair Prolapse Repair System for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse to traditional native tissue repair through 36 months of follow-up.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prospective Performance Analysis of the Exair(TM) Prolapse Repair System in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse#805828
- Study of the Elevate Anterior and Apical Prolapse Repair System Compared to Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#851202
- Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation#1139742
- Outcomes After Sacrocolpopexy With and Without Burch to Prevent Stress Urinary Incontinence in 3rd and 4th Degree Apical Uterine Prolapse#1072630
- Kegal Exercises With and Without Postural Correction on Postpartum Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Primiparous Women#834777
Record · ID 1100480
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive