ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single Versus Multi-port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Repair of Vaginal Apex Prolapse
A prospective randomized controlled study intended to compare the efficacy of 2 methods of robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse: 1. Via single-port. 2. Via multi-port.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy#875227
- Anchor for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy#882135
- Prospective Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Calistar S for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair#1113534
- Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment#890817
- Mesh Repair of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse#1088829
Record · ID 1100695
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive