ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Graftless Technique in Open Maxillary Sinus Lifting Using PEEK Versus Ti -Meshwork
The aim of the study is to assess the amount of bone formation with PEEK (intervention group) in comparison with Titanium Meshwork (control group) in maxillary sinus lifting using CBCT and assessment of the biocompatibility of the Meshwork and PEEK with the schniederian membrane integrity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Validity of PEEK PSI Containing Autogenous Bone Graft for Maxillary Reconstruction Following Lesion Enucleation#810330
- Assessment of Digital and Clinical Workflow Using Patient Specific Sticky Bone /Implant Housing PEEK Shell in Anterior Atrophic Maxilla: A Case Series#970069
- Predictors For Transosseous Maxillary Sinus Lift Complications#854557
- Assessment of Customized 3D Zirconium Versus Titanium Mesh for Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Delayed Implant Placement#918900
- Assessment of Efficacy of Prebent Titanium Mesh Versus Customized Poly-ether Ether Ketone Mesh for Three Dimensional Augmentation in Deficient Maxillary Ridge. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.#915655
Record · ID 1100706
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive