ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Ease of I-gel Insertion With Two Different Techniques in Adults
Study will evaluate the I-gel airway device standard insertion technique versus interventional (modified jaw thurst) insertion technique in adult patients. The half of the patients will receive standard and other half will receive the modified jaw thrust insertion technique
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Engineering a medical device for intranasal immunisation: ensuring targeted delivery and formulation stability#1053415
- Comparison of temporal versus nasal positioning of iStent Inject W®#322424
- Safety and Limitation of the 2nd Generation Laryngeal Mask Airway in the Lithotomy Position: An Obsevational Study#889956
- Engineering a medical device for intranasal immunisation: ensuring targeted delivery and formulation stability.#636472
- Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler Myomodulation for Non-Surgical Management of Excessive Gingival Display#909602
Record · ID 1100728
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive