PhilArchive
open access
What we talk to when we talk to language models
When we talk to large language models, who or what is our interlocutor? First, I address some issues about how best to characterize the interlocutor in terms of mental states. Second, I discuss questions in the philosophy of computation about what sort of AI system an LLM interlocutor might be. Third, I analyze some issues about personal identity in LLM interlocutors. Fourth, I draw some conclusions for issues about AI welfare and moral status.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Identity and Opinion Shape Political Sycophancy in LLMs#794015
- How Identity and Opinion Shape Political Sycophancy in LLMs#789996
- What it's like to be an LLM#108296
- The Collapse Of The Semantic Middle#689575
- Clarifying the Conceptual Landscape in AI Literacy Measurement: A Large Language Model Based Approach#342807
Record · ID 110138
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive