ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Full Length Versus Proximal Renal Arteries Ablation
Catheter-based renal sympathetic modification has been documented to be effective option for blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension, but the safety is still concerned around worldwide. Based on anatomic findings, blocking renal sympathetic nerves at proximity may be enough for successful renal sympathetic modifications. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of full length versus proximal ablation of bilateral renal arteries.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- HFS-guided Renal Ablation for Improving Outcome of Renal Denervation Procedure#898994
- Sympathetic Mapping/ Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial - Hemodialysis#828815
- Effects of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on the Cardiac and Renal Functions in Patients With Drug-resistant Hypertension Through MRI Evaluation#991663
- Renal Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease#913354
- RENABLATE-II Feasibility Study of Catheter Based Renal Denervation to Treat Resistant Hypertension - 157#628600
Record · ID 1102029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive