ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparative Study Evaluating Pain Experienced During Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a reversible contraceptive method with good efficacy and long-lasting action. One of the obstacles to IUD insertion, both for healthcare professionals and patients, is the fear of painful insertion. There is little data in the literature on the pain experienced by patients, and even less in relation to their parity. Several studies have been conducted and show that nulliparous women seemed to experience more intense pain compared to multiparous women (2.7 vs 1.9 p\<0.05)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Cesarean Section#882675
- LI4 Acupuncture for Analgesia in Intrauterine Device Insertion#915638
- Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Lidocaine Cream for IUD Insertion#1032378
- Pain Relief During IUD Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section#851195
- Pethidine Analgesia on Labor Duration#1047375
Record · ID 1102778
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive