ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of One Stage Versus Two Stage Exchange for Chronically Infected Total Hip and Total Knee Prostheses
Chronic infection after total joint arthroplasty generally requires implant exchange. Two stage exchange is considered as the gold standard procedure. However, some authors suggest that one stage exchange may be as effective. No consensus exists in the current literature. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the cost of both strategies in comparison to their success rate.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Contribution of a Clinical Pathway for the Treatment of Hip Prosthesis Infections#978955
- Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Childhood Septic Hip Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Infection Risk and Surgical Complications#644180
- ARTHR-IS (Arthroplasties' Infections Due to Staphylococcus Aureus)#835978
- Analysis of Pharmacological Aspects Regarding Infection Free Survival After Surgical Treatment of a Periprosthetic Hip Infection: a Microdialysis Study#901969
- Comparison of Hip Resurfacing to Large Femoral Head Total Hip Arthroplasty#1100760
Record · ID 1103287
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive