ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Anesthetic Efficacy of 1.8 ml Versus 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration
The aim of the study is to compare the anesthetic efficacy and need for supplemental anesthesia of 1.8 ml compared to 3.6 ml of 4% articaine buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of Buccal Infiltration Administration of Clonidine on the Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block#1152737
- Effect of Preoperative Oral Ibuprofen on Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block With Supplemental Buccal and Lingual Infiltrations Using Articaine in Mandibular Molar Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis#1096787
- Comparative study on the anesthetic efficacy between Articaine 4% and Lidocaine 2% in blocking the included lower third molars.#411567
- A Comparsion Between Articaine Hydrochloride and Buffered Lidocaine Hydrochloride in the Context of Maxillary Permanent Teeth Extraction Using the Buccal Infiltration Technique Only(Clinical Study).#910913
- Articaine Infiltration in Anesthetizing Mandibular Second Primary Molars#1151377
Record · ID 1103639
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive