arXiv (All)
open access
Why Better Cross-Lingual Alignment Fails for Better Cross-Lingual Transfer: Case of Encoders
Cross-lingual alignment is often assumed to improve cross-lingual transfer by bringing representations of different languages closer together. However, improvements in representational alignment do not consistently translate into better downstream performance. We investigate this disconnect using XL
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM Alignment--Utility Asymmetry under Semantic-Preserving Transformations#1117048
- Conformal Prediction under Exponential-Tilt Joint Shift#1105445
- Rethinking Personalized Generation: Test-Time Alignment via Factorized Ranking Models#1130346
- Rethinking Personalized Generation: Test-Time Alignment via Factorized Ranking Models#1108754
- Beyond Cross-Modal Alignment: Measuring and Leveraging Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models#173254
Record · ID 1104421
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive