arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing and Repairing LLM-as-Judge Failures in a Production Text-to-SQL Pipeline
Production text-to-SQL pipelines often end with an LLM-as-judge whose agreement with human annotators has never actually been measured. When we checked ours, the deployed gpt-4o-mini judge agreed with two-author gold at only Cohen's kappa = 0.04 on a disagreement-enriched set and 0.42 on a uniform-r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- IDORacle: Template-Guided SQL-Sink Mediation for Object-Level Authorization in Java Applications#1000376
- Designing Reliable LLM-as-a-Judge Measurement Systems for Multi-Turn Business Agents#1119028
- Ask, Don't Judge: Binary Questions for Interpretable LLM Evaluation and Self-Improvement#310851
- Weighted NetKAT: A Programming Language For Quantitative Network Verification#820422
- Corpus Characterization and Inverse Constitutional Fine-Tuning for Style-Aware Radiology Reports#1083684
Record · ID 1104489
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive