arXiv (All)
open access
Does Thinking Help Fairness? Reasoning Tokens Resolve Some Biases but Create More
Thinking in reasoning language models (RLMs) has been subject to debate on whether it resolves or amplifies bias. Prior works have shown competing conclusions in both directions. Using a within-model thinking-vs.-non-thinking ablation across QwQ-32B, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B, and Qwen3-32B on th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Thinking with Reasoning Skills: Fewer Tokens, More Accuracy#126561
- Lexical Prompt Compression for Large Language Models: A Training-Free, Deterministic Pipeline with Empirical Pareto Analysis Across Eleven Task Categories#1070963
- Reasoning or Rambling? Exploring the Effect of Thinking on Agent Persuasion#799887
- Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey#16604
- Detecting Hidden Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Linguistic, Behavioral, and Mechanistic Indicators#799203
Record · ID 1105327
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive