arXiv (All)
open access
A Benchmark and Diagnostic Study of Epistemic Admission in Shared Agent Memory
Evaluating claim admission in shared agent memory is challenging because repeated claims may be mistaken for independent evidence. An agent may copy or paraphrase a retrieved belief, while admitting a false claim exposes subsequent agents to it. To study this problem, we introduce the Correlated Pro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Shadows of Plato's Cave: Evaluating False Memory in Autonomous Agents via Counterfactual Reasoning#1144440
- Memory Updating Following Episodic and Semantic Retrieval: Evidence for Shared Mechanisms#29851
- What Eviction Destroys: A Restore-Counterfactual Audit of Forgetting in Agent Memory#673616
- Playing Along: Learning a Double-Agent Defender for Belief Steering via Theory of Mind#10343
- Memory and epistemic conservatism#716211
Record · ID 1105372
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive