arXiv (All)
open access
Robust to Which Model Change? A Unified Evaluation of Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Robust counterfactual explanations promise recourse that still works after the model behind it changes. Whether they keep that promise depends on what the change is. A small perturbation of the parameters, retraining on new data, and a new architecture are different events, and each existing method
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do stable performance metrics guarantee stable model predictions?: An empirical investigation using the GUSTO-1 dataset#1013230
- A Comparative Study of Counterfactual Explainers for Graph Neural Networks Enabling Multiple Types of Graph Edit#972062
- CausalBN-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of LLMs#974148
- FCx: An algorithm for finding Feasible Counterfactual Explanations#1013979
- How Reusable Are Benchmarks with Richer Feedback?#1116440
Record · ID 1105477
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive