arXiv (All)
open access
Epic-Organized vs. Requirement-Aligned Gherkin: An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Based Acceptance Criteria Generation
Automated authoring of Gherkin Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) acceptance criteria remains a manual bottleneck in requirements engineering. This study investigates whether epic-organized LLM-generated Gherkin produces higher quality and coverage than requirement-aligned generation. We compare our
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Predicting LLM Performance from Prompt Linguistic Features: An Empirical Study in Requirements Engineering#780924
- Predicting LLM Performance from Prompt Linguistic Features: An Empirical Study in Requirements Engineering#779549
- Clarity Is Not Assumed: Understanding LLM-Based Code Generation under Ambiguous Requirements#1012197
- LLARS: Enabling Domain Expert & Developer Collaboration for LLM Prompting, Generation and Evaluation#175320
- EXPLORING HUMAN FACTORS IN LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL-ASSISTED SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION#191278
Record · ID 1106006
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive