arXiv (All)
open access
Mind the second gap: The impact of gaps on noise and signal parameter inference
Gravitational-wave data is never analysed without some conditioning: filtering and tapering act multiplicatively on the noise, destroying the stationarity on which the Whittle likelihood --- the backbone of nearly all gravitational-wave inference --- rests. The problem is particularly evident for LI
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Billion-Euro Blind Spot How LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA Deleted the Only Real Echo and How the Livolsi Invariant Recovers It From Their Noise#707117
- Multi-messenger detectability of continuous gravitational waves from the near future to next generation detectors#987538
- The best of all worlds: gravitational-wave transient detection with multiple pipelines#1129651
- Uncovering stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with LISA#997897
- Correlated ‘noise’ in LIGO gravitational wave signals: an implication of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology#697524
Record · ID 1106249
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive