Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
It Doesn’t Take a Thief: Optical-Scan Voting Systems Fail Even Without Adversaries
Optical-scan voting systems and their supporting ecosystem of people, processes, and technology are fallible. While a substantial body of work examines adversarial threats to such systems, we have encountered jurisdictions where the possibility of tabulator error is not fully internalized. Stakehold
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Algorithmic Perpetrator, or Why We Need to Acknowledge the Many Things We Do Not (Yet) Know#73479
- The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation#717043
- Hacking Voters’ Trust in Democracy: Panel Evidence on Safeguarding Confidence in Election Integrity#164220
- Computer Security [Guest editors' introduction]#199454
- Outline of the Cloud-Terminal Theory A Historical System-Structural Exposition and Underlying Algorithms Based on "Logical Potentialism"#691371
Record · ID 1108251
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive