SocArXiv
metadata only
Researcher well-being as a leading indicator in research-funding governance: A system dynamics exploration of top-down versus bottom-up allocation
Governments face a recurring dilemma in dividing public research funding between top-down, competitive, mission-oriented programmes and bottom-up, investigator-led institutional grants. This research note presents an exploratory system dynamics model that endogenizes researcher motivation, conceived
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Researcher well-being as a leading indicator in research-funding governance: A system dynamics exploration of top-down versus bottom-up allocation#1108165
- The Preservation of Mystery: How Academic Incentives Prioritize Infinite Complexity Over Operational Utility#693018
- The shape of NSF openness to newcomers: same share, fewer doors#1180128
- The shape of NSF openness to newcomers: same share, fewer doors#1180028
- The role of local colleagues in establishing international scientific collaboration: Social capital in emerging science systems#197706
Record · ID 1108270
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive