arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Observational Multiplicity
Many prediction tasks can admit multiple models that can perform almost equally well. This phenomenon can undermine interpretability and safety when competing models assign conflicting predictions to individuals. In this work, we study how arbitrariness can arise in probabilistic classification task
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Probabilistically coherent credences despite opacity#86340
- Measuring consistency via ensemble margin and local prediction variability: Auditing decision systems in the presence of predictive multiplicity#821334
- How to Verify Probabilistic Consistency of Predictive Models#973309
- Amulet: a Python Library for Assessing Interactions Among ML Defenses and Risks#998016
- A Contextual Accuracy Dominance Argument for Probabilism#95963
Record · ID 1110107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive