arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
It's Safer to Give Personhood to Bears than to Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) developers are rhetorically flirting with the idea that AI systems might have interests or moral rights. While there has been a large volume of research on whether AI deserves rights, there has been less exploration of what AI rights would mean in practice. This paper ex
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Toward Legal Recognition of Artificial Intelligence Proposals for Limited Subject of law Status#964408
- Artificial Intelligence and Personal Rights in India: A Constitutional, Data Protection, and IPR Law Analysis#1176741
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights#270959
- Artificial Intelligence and Indian Legal System.#1178472
- (AI Rights 3): AI Legal Personhood: Digital Entity (DE) Status as a Game-Theoretic Solution to the Control Problem#112061
Record · ID 1110268
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive