arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
An Empirical Analysis of CodeQL False Positives and Query Refinements for Java Vulnerabilities
Static application security testing (SAST) tools help developers find vulnerabilities before deployment, but false positives create substantial triage effort. We study whether CodeQL false positives in Java security analysis form recurring, explainable patterns that can be reduced by refining the an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Empirical Analysis of CodeQL False Positives and Query Refinements for Java Vulnerabilities#660758
- An Improved Static Analysis Approach For Detecting Input Validation Vulnerabilities In Web Application#241318
- Continuous Discovery of Vulnerabilities in LLM Serving Systems with Fuzzing#178828
- SoK: You Find What You Seek: Rethinking Oracles, Guidance, and Input Generation in Hardware Fuzzing#1063511
- Using AI for Source Code Vulnerability AnalysisWhitepaperArtificial Intelligence15 Apr 2026Joshua Wright#168230
Record · ID 1110333
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive