arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Bias Audits Detect Bias but Disagree on Ranking: Evidence from Ten Instruments and Ten Frontier Models
Emerging AI regulation mandates bias audits of high-risk systems, and audit scores are beginning to be used to rank models. Both uses assume different audit tools measure the same thing well enough to compare. We test that assumption directly, running ten extrinsic audit instruments over a shared pa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governance#1052238
- Evaluating Frontier AI Agents as Autonomous Clinical Security Auditors#370287
- When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies#1049757
- VFR-Audit: Verdict-Level Reliability for Fairness Audits in Hospital Length-of-Stay Prediction#818888
- VFR-Audit: Verdict-Level Reliability for Fairness Audits in Hospital Length-of-Stay Prediction#808896
Record · ID 1110393
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive