arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Are We Grading Properly? Understanding Failure Modes in Medical Benchmarks
Medical evaluation is shifting from static option-based questioning to realistic clinical scenarios with open-ended output modes. Grading these at scale naively, however, is expensive, and rubric-based evaluation has become the dominant scalable alternative. We ask what happens when the rubrics them
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A 2-Tiered Rescue Protocol to Mitigate Difficulty-Based Failures of ChatGPT (GPT-5) and Gemini on the German M2 Medical Examination: Evaluation Study.#392970
- Benchmarking Outcomes in Pancreatic Surgery - WhippleBenchmarks.Org#842335
- Pulmonary Function Test Study - Automated Interpretation#969909
- Prospective Validation of the CoDE-HF Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure#897719
- Evaluating Disparities in Precision Oncology#623566
Record · ID 1110419
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive