arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Immensely Questionable Tests
We study self-referential multiple-choice tests in which the answer choices are positive integers and the question asks how many answer choices are correct. These tests quickly lead to several kinds of ambiguity and paradox. The paper presents the ideas through a dialogue between Queen Tanya and her
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Questions are higher-level acts#766261
- Turkish MMLU Pro: Traceable Option Augmentation and Its Validity Limits in Turkish Multiple-Choice Evaluation#1109472
- Simulated Reasoning and Self-Verification for Psychiatric Diagnosis in Generalist Large Language Models: Comparative Evaluation#191553
- Reasoning Instructions Can Break Answer Decoding in Vision--Language Models#1077207
- BLM-Hum1800: A Human-Validated Benchmark for Linguistic Competence in English and French#486095
Record · ID 1110462
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive