PhilArchive
open access
Professional Baseball and Performance-Enhancing Drugs
This paper analyzes the ethics of performance-enhancing drugs in professional baseball from the perspective of ethical theories: Kantianism, libertarianism, and utilitarianism. It argues that none of these theories can explain why performance-enhancing drugs should be prohibited. The paper argues that virtue ethics is the best moral framework for understanding the ethical problem of performance-enhancing drugs and why their use should be prohibited.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Lowering Restrictions on Performance Enhancing Drugs in Elite Sports#711592
- The Business Ethics of Recreational Marijuana#777465
- Moral Injury in Elite Sport: Trauma in the Failure of the Athlete's Quest.#193298
- The Philosophy of Athletic Expertise / A Filosofia da Expertise Atlética#689956
- Knowledge, Attitude and Educational Needs Towards Doping Among Athletes and Coaches in Competitive Running in Tanzania#436402
Record · ID 111126
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive