Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Context Drift and Normative Portability: How LLMs Reshape Epistemic Authority in Institutional Reasoning - extended abstract, accepted at MBR026, Rome, June 2026, forthcoming in Springer SAPERE series

Grasso, Valeriano
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Extended abstract, accepted at MBR026, Rome, June 2026, forthcoming in Springer SAPERE series Recent epistemological work on large language models has focused on questions of knowledge, reasoning, and normative competence, typically evaluating model outputs in terms of reliability, bias, or misuse. While these analyses have clarified important aspects of how LLMs perform epistemic tasks, I argue that they leave underexamined a distinct problem that emerges when language models are treated as models within institutional reasoning practices, rather than merely as tools. The central claim is that the primary epistemic risk associated with the institutionalization of LLMs is not misuse, but a phenomenon I call context drift.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 111229
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive