ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Is Treatment With FMS Tesla Chair Equal to Physiotherapy in First and Second-degree Urinary Incontinence?
100 patients with mild to moderate urinary incontinence will be randomly divided into two groups. One half will receive functional magnetic stimulation with the Tesla Chair for three months, while the other half will be treated with pelvic floor physiotherapy for the same period. After three and six months, a comparison will be made to determine which patient groups experience an improvement in urinary incontinence and how their muscle strength improves.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluate the Effect of Abdominal Electrical Muscle Stimulation on Abdominal Wall Restoration in Post - Partum Women#1089071
- Active Versus Passive Anal Sphincter Training in Patients With Fecal Incontinence#885752
- Non-Invasive Electrical and Magnetic Neuromodulation in Persons With Chronic Spinal#881741
- Postural Biofeedback and Exercise in Axial Spondyloarthritis#901405
- The Effect of Combined Exercise and NMES on Strength, Proprioception and Reaction Time in Scapholunate Instability#865762
Record · ID 1112484
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive