ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pure Single Incision Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (SIDG) Versus Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (TLDG)
1. Compare the immune response and postoperative complications between pure SIDG (single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy) and TLDG (totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy) for early gastric cancer (EGC) 2. Validate the safety, usefulness, minimal invasiveness and feasibility of SIDG (EGC)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy VS Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Middle Stomach#904686
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer#1153384
- Investigation of Impact of Indocyanine Green on Volume of Lymphadenectomy in Resectable Gastric Cancer#1046594
- Efficacy and Safety Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer#857170
- Neoantigen Reactive T Cells c for Chinese Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer#873371
Record · ID 1112937
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive