PhilArchive
open access
A critical analysis of Zimbabwe’s non-implementation of constitutional injunctions on devolution
Zimbabwe’s 2013 Constitution provides for a multi-level system of government whereby the government is constituted at national, provincial and local levels. Despite the new Constitution being relatively comprehensive about the devolution of powers to the subnational levels of government, the country is still trapped within the post-independence highly centralised unitary state design. Although the new Constitution was adopted in 2013, devolution has not yet been fully implemented in Zimbabwe. This non-implementation of the constitutional injunctions on devolution, almost a decade after the promulgation of the Constitution, brings into question the country’s commitment to the devolution of powers and constitutionalism. This article critiques this state of affairs, and identifies the politico-legal factors responsible for the country’s non-implementation of the constitutional injunctions on the devolution of powers to subnational levels of government. This article’s central thesis is that the full devolution of powers is one of the significant levers of constitutional transformation in Zimbabwe.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decentralisation and constitutionalism in Africa: A comparative analysis of South Africa and Zimbabwe#108628
- Protesting For a Problematic Status Quo: Romanian Magistrates’ Responses to Judicial Pension Reform#86327
- Ricœur’s Intersection and the Harmonisation of Law and Algorithms#108779
- INTEGRATED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE- THE COLLAPSE OF TRADITIONAL JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES#621324
- States, markets, and transnational law: a re-evaluation of the legal ‘constitution’ of money#374246
Record · ID 111370
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive