ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Major Failure Rate Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Techniques Versus Hall Technique in the Management of Decayed Primary Molars in Children Aged 4-6 Years Old
This study is designed to compare major failure rate between ART ( excavation of caries with hand instruments and placing glass ionomer restoration without the use of rotary instruments) versus hall technique ( placing a stainless steel crown on the decayed primary molar without prepartion or caries removal)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparing Minimally Invasive Techniques Used In Treatment Of Carious Primary Molars In Children#802491
- Clinical Performance of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth#887652
- Efficacy of Hall Technique in Atypical Lesions on Primary Teeth#890524
- Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars#869901
- Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial#1058519
Record · ID 1113744
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive