ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Relationship Between Analgesia Techniques and Post-cesarean Recovery Quality
The question remains whether the patients in whom USG-guided regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are applied have a better recovery score than subarachnoid morphine administration, which is considered the gold standard. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of recovery score using the Obstetric Recovery Quality Score-ObsQoR-10 questionnaire experienced by the patients who underwent elective cesarean section and compare the results of different regional anesthesia techniques with subarachnoid morphine.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of the Effects of TFPB and Anterior QLB on Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section Surgery#859180
- Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block After Cesarean Delivery#1162228
- Postoperative Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: Is There a Role for the Quadratus Lumborum Block?#917422
- Effect of Subarachnoid Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Obese Pregnant Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section#842881
- Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block After Caesarean Section#884117
Record · ID 1114616
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive