ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion
This study evaluates 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SARME) in the treatment of maxillary transverse deficiency. Half of participants will undergo an osteotomy between the maxillary central incisors, while the other half will undergo an osteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines (bilateral osteotomies).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Expander Via Two Approaches of Microosteoperforations#829020
- Biological Anchorage With Selective Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in Canine Distalization#908225
- Mandibular Response After Maxillary Orthopedic Expansion in Class II Growing Subjects#1103199
- Study the Effect of Upper Expansion Appliances on Lower Jaw Forward Projection/Growth#843636
- Accuracy of Maxillary Repositioning During Orthognathic Surgery#1058097
Record · ID 1114626
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive