ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Compare Safety and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 Versus Sunitinib.
Compare safety and efficacy of BIBF 1120 versus sunitinib in patients with advanced RCC and to investigate the effects of BIBF 1120 on the heart rate (HR) corrected QT interval (QTcF).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study to Assess the Safety of BAY1067197 in Stable Heart Failure Patients on Standard Therapy Including ß-blocker#896747
- Study Of Comparing SAF-189s With Crizotinib In First Line ALK-Positive Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC#845519
- Drug-drug Interaction Study of Vorasidenib With Bupropion, Repaglinide, Flurbiprofen, Omeprazole, Midazolam, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Adult Participants#1033277
- A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Repeat Oral Dosing of GSK2118436 on Cardiac Repolarization in Subjects With V600 BRAF Mutation-Positive Tumors#1125050
- Efficacy and Safety of Jaktinib in Participants With Severe Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia(COVID-19)#979317
Record · ID 1114975
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive