arXiv (All)
open access
Extractable Memorization From First Principles
Recent work on extractable memorization in language models suffers from two contrasting validity problems. Some studies overstate extraction, for example, by using sequences too short to distinguish memorization from predictability. Others imply that extraction is unreliable evidence because models
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Don't Forget! Decomposing the Training Dynamics of Memorization in Language Models#1129542
- Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs#997322
- Chronicle: Cut-Point Replay for Regression Testing of LLM Agents#1034432
- Chronicle: Cut-Point Replay for Regression Testing of LLM Agents#978466
- Uncheatable Eval: Dynamic Compression-Based Evaluation of Language Models#1064054
Record · ID 1115565
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive