arXiv (All)
open access
Simple Extensions of Single-Objective Acquisition Functions and Hedge Strategies for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) is commonly approached through specialized acquisition functions or scalarization schemes designed to explicitly account for trade-offs among non-preferential objectives. In this work, we show that such complexity might be unnecessary. We propose a framew
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization via Adaptive \varepsilon-Constraints Decomposition#31292
- MoFlow: Multi-Objective Agentic Workflow Generation#1142895
- Portfolio-Based Constrained Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design#1014142
- Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization for Model Merging#458292
- Contextual Multi-Objective Optimization: Rethinking Objectives in Frontier AI Systems#155333
Record · ID 1115896
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive