arXiv (All)
open access
Role Support in Knowledge-Graph Error Ranking: Predictor Regimes and Evaluation Policies
When do role-specific training counts improve knowledge-graph error ranking? We evaluate fifteen from-scratch predictors, nine development-selected continuation stages, and six fixed ensembles across three static graphs. A positive penalty for missing training support has no stable error-ranking ori
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ImbalancE: Inference-Time Latent Search Against Degree Imbalance in Link Prediction#1132197
- Chimaera: A Mixture-of-Graph-Experts Architecture for Cross-Task and Cross-Dataset Graph Learning#986039
- Ground-Truth Subgraphs for Better Training and Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Augmented LLMs#1049699
- Statistical Inference for Causal Discovery under Selection and Latent Variables via Single-Target Interventions#1076512
- OSCAR: Order-aware Scoring and Calibration for AI Rankings#1050313
Record · ID 1116185
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive