arXiv (All)
open access
Multi-Legal-Bench: When the Answer Is in the Input. Label Leakage in Legal Benchmarks Built from Court Registries
Court registries publish millions of decisions with structured metadata, which makes them an attractive source of labelled legal benchmarks: the court type, the form of the decision and its subject area come for free. We show that this convenience has a cost that registry-derived benchmarks rarely m
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pointer-Resolved Drafting: A Citation-Graph RAG Architecture for Verifiable Quotation in Legal Memos#478788
- Nolan & Ors v Office of the Legal Cost Adjudicators of the High Court [2026] IEHC 337 (13 May 2026)#267787
- Atomic and Holistic LLM Judges for Reference-Grounded Support Labels: A Prompt-Controlled Comparison#1143722
- Using Citation Analysis Techniques for Computer-Assisted Legal Research in Continental Jurisdictions#679181
- The New Market for Federal Judicial Law Clerks#21038
Record · ID 1116307
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive