PhilArchive
open access
Neo-Conventionalism and the Imaginative Origin of Haecceitistic Intuitions
Modal neo-conventionalism accounts for metaphysical modality in terms of conceptual rules. Many modern neo-conventionalists have tried, in their own anti-metaphysical ways, to account for, rather than deny, important “metaphysical phenomena,” such as a posteriori necessity (Sidelle 1987, Thomasson 2020, Warren 2022a), de re modality (Povich 2024a,b, 2025, Sidelle 1987, Thomasson 2020), essence (Locke 2020, Locke and Thomasson 2023), grounding (Locke 2020), and counterpossibles (Locke 2019). In this paper, I aim to do the same for haecceitistic possibilities.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Demands of Self-Constraint: Diagnosis and Idealism in Wittgenstein, Diamond, and Kant#714006
- A Plea for a Peircean Turn in Analytic Philosophy#757439
- Co to znaczy być transcendentalnym idealistą i empirycznym realistą jednocześnie? O statusie rzeczy w filozofii transcendentalnej.#760598
- Neo-Absurdist Manifesto v 1.8#718312
- Pers i problem kvalija#91192
Record · ID 111647
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive