arXiv (All)
open access
Exact Trade-Level Attribution of FRTB-IMA Capital
The internal-models approach of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB-IMA) determines market-risk capital at the aggregate level of a bank's approved trading desks, but it does not say how that charge should be attributed to individual trades. Risk managers, capital planners and validator
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The $6.11 Problem: A Field Report on What My Brain Does to a Bank Fee (and Where the Trail Actually Ended)#690280
- DisclosureBeta: A Measurement-Channel Theory for Regime-Conditioned Betas from LLM-Read Risk Disclosures#925283
- DisclosureBeta: A Measurement-Channel Theory for Regime-Conditioned Betas from LLM-Read Risk Disclosures#921047
- Incremental Risk Charge Methodology#778168
- Forward-Looking Credit Loss Recognition and Banks' Internal Risk Models: Timeliness, Reporting Bias, and Lending Effects#651573
Record · ID 1116569
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive