arXiv (All)
open access
Black-Box Auditing of Epistemic Reliability in Multi-Agent Debate Distillation
Debate distillation adapts weaker verifiers using multi-agent debate transcripts to improve their judgement in subsequent debates, but gains on monitored tasks do not establish reliability on related unmonitored tasks. We study epistemic reliability degradation, in which adaptation preserves monitor
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assurance-Scoped Reliability for Agentic Networks: Capturing the State That Matters#410976
- Feedback-Driven Differentiation and Stabilization in Multi-Layer Adaptive Agent Systems#709517
- What epistemologists talk about when they talk about reflection#768054
- Closing the Consistency Gap: Self-Evolving Agents That Learn to Stay on Course#668091
- Achieving Coherence: Modeling Complexity in Dynamic Systems#94981
Record · ID 1116692
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive