arXiv (All)
open access
Rethinking Training-Inference Mismatch in LLM Reinforcement Learning: Where It Arises and How to Correct It
We study training-inference mismatch in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models, where rollouts are sampled by an inference engine while gradients are computed by a training engine, and the two engines assign different probabilities to the same tokens. To acco
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On Language Drift during RLVR Post-Training#1161046
- On Language Drift during RLVR Post-Training#1157363
- On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Models#1116801
- Sharpening Tax in Post-Training#1167700
- Sharpening Tax in Post-Training#1156781
Record · ID 1116775
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive