arXiv (All)
open access
From Outcomes to Strategies: Learning Strategy Utility for Mathematical Reasoning
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has substantially improved mathematical reasoning. However, terminal correctness alone provides limited insight into the quality of high-level strategies, such as theorem selection and subgoal decomposition, when considered separately from their subsequ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Function-Structured Reinforcement Learning with Executable Verifiers for Mathematical Reasoning#1157000
- Creating Solid Foundation Through Mathematical Word Problem Solving: A Transformative Approach Leading to Good Performance#436176
- INSPIRE: An Internalize-Then-Improve Approach for Example-Driven Mathematical Reasoning#927451
- How Effective is Digital-Assisted CTL for Mathematical Reasoning? A Systematic Literature Review#264900
- Reinforcement Learning in Operational Research: A Technical Review and Practical Roadmap#1051153
Record · ID 1116813
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive